Gladen Aerospace 20 Tweeter


Up for test is the Gladen Aerospace 20mm tweeter.  Product specs can be found here.

IMG_2251 IMG_2252

Small Signal Parameters and Impedance

Results as measured via Dayton’s DATs measurement tool.  Which is a very little handy tool to have.  😉

  • f(s)= 1073 Hz
  • R(e)= 3.41 Ohms
  • Z(max)= 5.87 Ohms
  • Q(ms)= 1.831
  • Q(es)= 2.536
  • Q(ts)= 1.063
  • L(e)= 0.73 mH

gladen 20 imepdance

 

 

Frequency Response

Frequency Response and the following Harmonic Distortion measurements were taken using Dayton’s OmniMic measurement system.

The frequency response measurements below are on-axis (0 degrees) and off-axis (15, 30, 60 degrees), measured at 2.83v/1m.

gladen 20mm fr
To get an idea of the off-axis response vs the on-axis (0 degrees) response, I normalized the above.  What you get is the relative output level of each axis vs the on-axis level.

gladen 20 normalized

Harmonic Distortion Testing

Legend:

Maroon – Fundamental

Blue – THD

Red – 2nd Order Distortion

Pink – 3rd Order Distortion

Green – 4th order

Teal – 5th order

Testing done in the nearfield to emulate 90dB and 96dB output at 1 meter.

gladen 20 aerospace HD90 gladen 20 aerospace HD96

Impressions/Results

Given these are the little brother of the Aerospace 28mm, I can literally copy/paste my thoughts of the build qualtiy:  Let’s start with the build quality… impressive.  These tweeters feel heavy, which one typically equates to build quality.  Though, I’m not a fan of generalizing, that generalization is legitimate in this case.  There is no plastic housing; these are all (some form) of metal.  I’m not necessarily a fan of the large-ish gauge wire.  I do appreciate no terminals (honestly, they usually just cause your cutout diameter to be widdled out even more to accommodate the wire ran to the terminal).  I just think Gladen could have used a tick smaller wire here given most will have to immediately bend the wire in the install to clear whatever pillar or sail panel they install these in.

The Fs is measured at just above 1kHz.  To get an idea of what this means on the high-pass crossover, let’s evaluate the HD results.  At 96dB output the THD (blue) is 2.25% at 1khz.  The THD is less than 0.50% down to 2.5khz where it is comprised almost entirely of 2nd order distortion above 1.5khz.   Above 1.5khz there is about 15dB separation between 2nd and 3rd order components.  Given the fact this is a smaller tweeter physically, the Fs, and the THD results, you can expect to cross this in the region of 2.5khz-4khz, depending on crossover slope.  If you want to use a shallow slope, 3.5-4khz high-pass may be a good safe area with at least a 12dB/octave slope.  If you use a 24dB/octave slope, I’d say 3.0-3.5khz is OK but below 3khz is beginning to push it for a tweeter of this size for high output.

Measured sensitivity is right around 85.5dB.  On-axis, the response is good.  The response exhibits a wide trough centered at about 5khz, resulting in a 2.5dB drop in output.  Otherwise, the response is quite linear.  There’s also about a 1dB dip centered around 11.8khz that fades out the further off-axis you go.  At 30 degrees off-axis, the response is down approximately 3dB at 10khz.  At 60 degrees off-axis, the response is down approximately 6.5dB at 10khz.  Above 12khz the 60 degrees off-axis response drops quickly.  However, 30 degrees is only 3dB below 0 degrees even at 20khz which is quite remarkable.

Bottom line: Very good performance in a compact tweeter.  Great polar response with very low distortion above 2.5khz.  Perfect for a 3-way system with a 3-5″ midrange.

Below are some comparison pictures between this tweeter and it’s bigger brother mentioned earlier:

IMG_2257

PS:  If you would like to help me keep up funds for testing additional drivers, there’s a little ‘contribute’ button that goes through Paypal all the way at the bottom of every page.  Any little bit helps.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *